It is currently Mon Oct 14, 2019 1:23 pm



Reply to topic  [ 13 posts ] 
DV, Streedhan amd DP3 
Author Message

Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2012 5:01 am
Posts: 134
In almost all the DV cases 20-30 tolas of jewellary is mentioned as Streedhan. There are two situations: What happens if:

1. It is claimed that this is given by boy's parents. Would that help boy's case?

2. It is claimed that this is given by girl's parents with or without the use of word dowry. Does it amount to giving dowry and DP3 can be invoked against girl's side. If so can this be invoked against the girl also?


Sat Feb 02, 2013 3:13 pm
Profile

Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2012 9:04 am
Posts: 522
raman727 wrote:
In almost all the DV cases 20-30 tolas of jewellary is mentioned as Streedhan. There are two situations: What happens if:

1. It is claimed that this is given by boy's parents. Would that help boy's case?

If they say so, then there wont be any case at all........

2. It is claimed that this is given by girl's parents with or without the use of word dowry. Does it amount to giving dowry and DP3 can be invoked against girl's side. If so can this be invoked against the girl also?

Even if the word dowry is mentioned....They cant be tried because of this and especialy in DP3.... The get required immunity under DP6....


Last edited by against498a on Sat Feb 02, 2013 6:46 pm, edited 1 time in total.



Sat Feb 02, 2013 3:35 pm
Profile

Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2012 5:01 am
Posts: 134
But DP3 has been invoked successfully in many cases. DP7 immunity would be there to the girl who files the case but not to the parents of the girl. Please advise.

My main question is about Streedhan in DV cases. Would that attract DP3, if not to the girl then to the family members of the girl.


Sat Feb 02, 2013 3:47 pm
Profile

Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2012 5:01 am
Posts: 134
Seems i have posted it under wrong topic. It should have gone under DV not under Success Stories. Am sorry for that.


Sat Feb 02, 2013 3:58 pm
Profile

Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2012 9:04 am
Posts: 522
Success rate of DP3 is nil as far as Im concerned.....

Streedhan wont attract DP3 anyway.....


Sat Feb 02, 2013 6:49 pm
Profile

Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2012 5:01 am
Posts: 134
Well Streedhan includes gifts and also anything given by boy's side also. But if while giving details about streedhan it is mentioned girl's parents have given 25 tolas of jewellary worth 7 lacs, then how it is not dowry and why it should not attract DP3?


Sun Feb 03, 2013 4:19 am
Profile

Joined: Sun Aug 26, 2012 2:05 pm
Posts: 796
It will attract dp3 but, at the same time , they get immunity under dp7.
If you press charges also, they will get quash easily in high court, there are lot of judgements on it,
So seniors are advising don't waste time and money.
Money is ok, but time is precious..


Last edited by santoshd123 on Wed Feb 13, 2013 6:26 pm, edited 1 time in total.



Sun Feb 03, 2013 5:50 am
Profile

Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2012 5:01 am
Posts: 134
Point taken. But one last thing. Immunity in DP7 would be available to the girl only and not to her parents.

Had that been the case then we would not have so many success stories of prosecution of girl's side in 498.

Correct me if i missed something.


Sun Feb 03, 2013 11:41 am
Profile

Joined: Mon Sep 13, 2010 2:30 pm
Posts: 4740
raman727 wrote:
Point taken. But one last thing. Immunity in DP7 would be available to the girl only and not to her parents.

Had that been the case then we would not have so many success stories of prosecution of girl's side in 498.

Correct me if i missed something.


This is nothing but true.....where we have frequent success stories about girl family trapped back in DP?? 498a does not trap girl's family to start with!
Be clear in ur approach. What u want to acheieve?
* Dowry is different than istreedhan
* Dowry harassment invokes 498a & istreedhan non return invokes 406
DP-3/DP-4 Sec 120b, 506 etc accompany the party of 498a+ 406 as per demand.


Tue Feb 05, 2013 5:24 am
Profile

Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2012 5:01 am
Posts: 134
Actually that was the general thought that in almost all DV cases, some jewellary is mentioned as Streedhan which is invariably given by the parents of the girl, so may be DP3 can be applied there.

But as suggested that is not the case.

Specifically to my case, wife says that out of her Streedhan I bought a property and hence she is laying claim to the property. Very clever!

But i have all the proofs that this is not the case and convincingly prove that she is just telling a lie.

Hope now she would not be able to lay claim to Streedhan.


Tue Feb 05, 2013 3:22 pm
Profile

Joined: Mon Sep 13, 2010 2:30 pm
Posts: 4740
Property can not be claimed in this way at all. So relax. U must have registered that property. All transactions are in black & white these days when we purchase a property.


Wed Feb 06, 2013 4:49 am
Profile

Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2012 9:04 am
Posts: 522
@raman727

The name of the person on whom the property is registered matters.


Wed Feb 06, 2013 6:53 am
Profile

Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2012 5:01 am
Posts: 134
Well it is very much registered and am sure is safe. So let us see how things move.

And thanks galsober and other well wishers.


Wed Feb 06, 2013 1:04 pm
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 13 posts ] 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Designed by ST Software for PTF.